Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2019 18:34:33 +0000 From: ng0@n0.is To: ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: HOTARU-YA <hotaru@tail.net>, ng0@n0.is Subject: Re: licensing/restricted question about games/oneko-sakura Message-ID: <20190603183433.46c4ukzwhjc7ciht@uptimegirl> In-Reply-To: <20190603182028.lsnyq7nfmhjysium@uptimegirl> References: <20190603182028.lsnyq7nfmhjysium@uptimegirl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
(Resend because I wasn't subscribed before) ng0@n0.is transcribed 1.2K bytes: > Hi, > > I have recently picked up oneko-sakura and did some maintenance > work to make it build at least on NetBSD 8. So far I assumed it > was public-domain, going by reading the entries in the source > and the original URLs it points to, as well as Debian's license > document. > > svn commit 33748 of the Makefile states tt PATCHFILES, > which is defined as > PATCHFILES= oneko-1.2.sakura.3.diff.gz > > contains deriviative work. This was 18 years 7 months ago, > about the same time development stopped (1999 iirc). > > Debian considers the same source (3 patch revisions later, 1.2.sakura.5) > as: https://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs//main/o/oneko/oneko_1.2.sakura.6-11_copyright > > > As the pkgsrc-wip maintainer I went by the element of least surprise > and copied the restrict and NO_CDROM for pkgsrc. > > My questions: why did you come to this conclusion, and > did someone who contributed to this check later revisions of > oneko-sakura (I think I based my work on sakura6, the last > public release)? > > I ask this as both a package maintainer as well as the maintainer of the > new oneko source as both public domain as well as bsd-2 don't go well > together with "no cdrom". > > > Cheers, > ng0
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20190603183433.46c4ukzwhjc7ciht>