From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Mar 10 18:40:35 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AC8AD06AF8 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 18:40:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (static-24-113-41-81.wavecable.com [24.113.41.81]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CEAC1BDB for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 18:40:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) Received: from ultimatedns.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by udns.ultimatedns.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id v2AIeSNW039834 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 10:40:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) To: In-Reply-To: References: <20170308160420.GG22199@rancor.immure.com>, From: "Chris H" Subject: Re: Best way to cause synth to ignore rebuilding of a port?? Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 10:40:34 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=fixed MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 18:40:35 -0000 On Wed, 8 Mar 2017 16:34:45 +0000 Matthew Seaman wrote > On 2017/03/08 16:04, Bob Willcox wrote: > > Note that I haven't tried ver 52 of firefox, but from what I've read it > > sounds like all plugins/addons other than flash are no longer supported. I think the answer to your question can be answered by using pkg(8)'s lock option. As memory serves; synth honors anything pkg has to offer. HTH --Chris > > Make that: all *NPAPI* plugins other than Flash are now unsupported. > That's stuff like the Java plugin or the OpenH264 Video Codec from Cisco > (which I seem to have installed and can no-longer remember why. Some > sort of video conference thing a long time ago). > > Ordinary add-ons like AddBlock-Plus or NoScript don't use NPAPI and so > are not affected by this move. > > I've been on version 52 on my Mac desktop for a while with no noticeable > problems (well, none beyond what you normally got with FF in earlier > versions.) > > Cheers, > > Matthew