From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Oct 30 10:06:43 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9638492A
 for <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 10:06:43 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from erik@cederstrand.dk)
Received: from csmtp2.one.com (csmtp2.one.com [91.198.169.22])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C2F68FC1C
 for <freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 10:06:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.1.18] (unknown [217.157.7.221])
 by csmtp2.one.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 79EF13043024;
 Tue, 30 Oct 2012 10:06:36 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\))
Subject: Re: How about finally replacing GNATS?
From: Erik Cederstrand <erik@cederstrand.dk>
In-Reply-To: <20121030082900.GH3309@server.rulingia.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 11:06:36 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <35AB4227-2053-4678-BE71-576B01E48FE1@cederstrand.dk>
References: <4E593932.8060303@FreeBSD.org>
 <CAF6rxgnCPcisTFn37VtYsvHhttQvc1=DxXLuqq7kScJG3UL=cA@mail.gmail.com>
 <C76EF9E9-2F9A-4F49-9ADE-1C7074510BC4@cederstrand.dk>
 <86sj928vks.fsf@ds4.des.no>
 <4FB39F66-0434-43F1-9705-3C81CDF2A25F@cederstrand.dk>
 <86ehkm8s5v.fsf@ds4.des.no>
 <0EF669C7-0ED4-4BD4-9170-C49A7CA91603@cederstrand.dk>
 <20121025193115.GD40357@in-addr.com>
 <CAF6rxgmeJ9Kf-W3hEZwH2qCxoWve0Hqd27aYC=Y4wACyUm8+LQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAGE5yCq_SrvcU1FzPN2U1=s+GahVRBOAhE6dy8KAwcG_-TDs+w@mail.gmail.com>
 <20121030082900.GH3309@server.rulingia.com>
To: Peter Jeremy <peter@rulingia.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499)
Cc: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org,
 Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav <des@des.no>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture <freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-arch>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 10:06:43 -0000

Den 30/10/2012 kl. 09.29 skrev Peter Jeremy <peter@rulingia.com>:

> On 2012-Oct-27 22:25:54 -0700, Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> wrote:
>> On the exceedingly remote chance that somebody genuinely can't/won't
>> access an HTTP link in 2012+ there's always the option of having them
>> email one of the lists.
>=20
> Just because a sysadmin has HTTP access doesn't mean that the machine
> with the issue has access.  There needs to be a simple way to collect
> the PR data on one system and transfer it to another machine where it
> can be submitted.  With send-pr, you can copy the PR file (or just
> copy it off the console).

Apart from running uname -a, what does send-pr offer on a machine =
without HTTP access compared to just filling out the send-pr form on a =
machine that does have HTTP access?

Erik=