Date: Thu, 06 Feb 1997 10:46:28 +0200 From: Nadav Eiron <nadav@barcode.co.il> To: Softweyr LLC <softweyr@xmission.com> Cc: "Jin Guojun[ITG]" <jin@george.lbl.gov>, questions@freebsd.org, hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DEC 21040 v.s. DEC 21140 chip for ethernet cards Message-ID: <32F99A64.FCB@barcode.co.il> References: <199702060051.RAA08170@xmission.xmission.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Softweyr LLC wrote: > > > Would someone please give me some information about the difference > > between ethernet cards using DEC 21040 and DEC 21140 chips? > > Is 21040 chip for 10BT and 21140 for 100 BT? > > Yes. > > -- > "Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?" > > Wes Peters Softweyr LLC > http://www.xmission.com/~softweyr softweyr@xmission.com Note that there are newer variants for both: For 10BaseT there is the 21041 (works fine). For 100BaseT there is the 21140-AC (needs some patching to the driver sometimes, search the archives for recent postings) and the 21142 (never tried it on FreeBSD). Nadav
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?32F99A64.FCB>