From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 12 03:26:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A85BB1065670 for ; Wed, 12 May 2010 03:26:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oloringr@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D40E8FC08 for ; Wed, 12 May 2010 03:26:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm1 with SMTP id 1so435146fxm.13 for ; Tue, 11 May 2010 20:26:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:references:in-reply-to:x-face:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=VdWJSdBL48sXz1tO0Bs7ingtijsYXRSTFnRoJfWLH90=; b=P+KIQHv4XKF9mqI7XIaZifX5afXsvmBZeOlR3YyguXMosAMXHoQGXCmXDhQdUUS2ua G/5pKMkCklIm8nNohpKEpz16C/rjV43gGuR6LDIY0EgrHqa+8L/NJGH4654A1FNN9UxM 0DVBVikJ7BkhY+OPYSYHJlG5XeVmubYJSWBGk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:x-face :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=XX0FqwSV4dFJzkupgKEP/xDX93iQAeGsrKTpoiz0CV4pnR47DxWl4f3dN4wEibJvq2 uK30Dx2cq2lrY9hQeHeANh4YL42E5Bw3iMXAS3GIOLmhQFPugfuylvgST8svRwX0042r WYzsuX7zplCth7vyiNnQOs/r3cRMcV7Vt1w8Q= Received: by 10.103.7.30 with SMTP id k30mr4041782mui.24.1273634772039; Tue, 11 May 2010 20:26:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from media.localnet (188.4.79.178.dsl.dyn.forthnet.gr [188.4.79.178]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 25sm27784105mul.56.2010.05.11.20.26.11 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 11 May 2010 20:26:11 -0700 (PDT) From: Ed Jobs To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 06:26:44 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.3 (Linux/2.6.33-ARCH; KDE/4.4.3; i686; ; ) References: <4BEA1B88.8050702@wingfoot.org> In-Reply-To: <4BEA1B88.8050702@wingfoot.org> X-Face: %5EDs|At1pm>WE%P0}6)Hi*s, JH2J${69~j)R"Yu'^P9R3#fvi{LmpsCzxvX*38/, kxcUd QVrlS0G,}-ll{||\P]; *'Gz`RTG+dzconmNyDY3rJHBmpEJkFj|; %vZO&~T")='B<; 88~[ Cltx6#}N*E MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart4920005.JgmZsTdu4Q"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201005120626.44764.oloringr@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Odd routing issue... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 03:26:13 -0000 --nextPart4920005.JgmZsTdu4Q Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wednesday 12 of May 2010 06:07, Glenn Sieb wrote: > I'm getting a route added upon reboot with the hostname of the box, > going to lo0. > It's preventing things like, pinging itself. I can manually delete the > route, but.. where is it being set to begin with?! well, that behaviour is what i would expect. After all, the machine knows t= hat=20 to ping its own ip, it has to use the lo0 interface. It just resolves your ip with the hostname of the machine. So as far as i see, this is the intended behaviour. (You can use netstat -rn to see the actual ip and not hostnames.) If you can't ping localhost, i'd say that the problem lies elsewere.=20 (firewalls probably) You can check with tcpdump to see what happens and your pings don't get a=20 reply. =2D-=20 Real programmers don't document. If it was hard to write, it should be hard= to=20 understand. --nextPart4920005.JgmZsTdu4Q Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAkvqH/QACgkQBPpdVEWKA31j4wCgvSE2N6+8ZbUKOrNczxqRfGfL 6e4AnRQsMcqhWQdkPws+p38SrkyOcMZD =OFp2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart4920005.JgmZsTdu4Q--