From owner-freebsd-questions  Thu Dec  7 14:16:43 1995
Return-Path: owner-questions
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id OAA27054
          for questions-outgoing; Thu, 7 Dec 1995 14:16:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Root.COM (implode.Root.COM [198.145.90.17])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id OAA27048
          Thu, 7 Dec 1995 14:16:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from corbin.Root.COM (corbin [198.145.90.50]) by Root.COM (8.6.12/8.6.5) with ESMTP id OAA06798; Thu, 7 Dec 1995 14:16:36 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by corbin.Root.COM (8.6.12/8.6.5) with SMTP id OAA06221; Thu, 7 Dec 1995 14:17:22 -0800
Message-Id: <199512072217.OAA06221@corbin.Root.COM>
To: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
cc: root@buffnet.net (Steve Hovey), jau@jau.csc.fi, questions@freebsd.org,
        hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Any operational code using mmap() on FreeBSD ? 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 07 Dec 95 11:29:02 MST."
             <199512071829.LAA05180@phaeton.artisoft.com> 
From: David Greenman <davidg@Root.COM>
Reply-To: davidg@Root.COM
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 1995 14:17:20 -0800
Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

>The question is what are the failure modes on 2.1.  If there aren't any,
>you should upgrade to resolve the problem.  If there are, and they are
>more severe, you should report them to be corrected, since 2.1 *is*
>being maintained (in the form of the 2.2-current).

   Uh, actually, 2.1 is being maintained seperately from 2.2-current.

-DG