From owner-freebsd-stable Wed May 15 12:17: 5 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from snafu.adept.org (snafu.adept.org [63.201.63.44]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2586D37B408 for ; Wed, 15 May 2002 12:16:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by snafu.adept.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 027099EE33; Wed, 15 May 2002 12:16:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by snafu.adept.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEDAF9B001; Wed, 15 May 2002 12:16:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 12:16:50 -0700 (PDT) From: Mike Hoskins To: Oli Kuemmel Cc: Freebsd-Stable Subject: Re: CVSUP to 4.5-STABLE not 4.6-PRERELEASE In-Reply-To: <20020515185707.A58542@gvs.dyn.bawue.de> Message-ID: <20020515121218.N50763-100000@snafu.adept.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 15 May 2002, Oli Kuemmel wrote: > Does this mean tracking RELENG_4_5 leads to 4.6-RELEASE? I track RELENG_4 (STABLE), which leads to: 4.5-STABLE 4.6-PRERELEASE 4.6-STABLE ... PRERELASE is just another name for STABLE before an official release. If you're tracking RELENG_4_5 (is that RELEASE+bug/security fixes?) and not STABLE (RELENG_4) then I'd expect you to follow a different version path. Later, -Mike -- "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." --Benjamin Franklin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message