From owner-freebsd-current  Mon Sep  8 11:40:48 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id LAA22135
          for current-outgoing; Mon, 8 Sep 1997 11:40:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sos.freebsd.dk (sos.freebsd.dk [195.8.129.33])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA22113
          for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 8 Sep 1997 11:40:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from sos@localhost) by sos.freebsd.dk (8.8.7/8.7.3) id UAA02904; Mon, 8 Sep 1997 20:38:50 +0200 (MEST)
From: Søren Schmidt <sos@sos.freebsd.dk>
Message-Id: <199709081838.UAA02904@sos.freebsd.dk>
Subject: Re: lousy disk perf. under cpu load (was IDE vs SCSI)
In-Reply-To: <199709081700.KAA15180@george.arc.nasa.gov> from "lamaster@george.arc.nasa.gov" at "Sep 8, 97 10:00:02 am"
To: lamaster@george.arc.nasa.gov
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 1997 20:38:50 +0200 (MEST)
Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL30 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

In reply to lamaster@george.arc.nasa.gov who wrote:
> 
> But, I'm also wondering if there are any kernel config options
> or startup config options wrt filesystems, scheduler, or anything 
> else that might explain the large differences between what I and 
> some others experience and what some of you wizards out there are 
> getting (e.g. 1 to 1.5 hr elapsed time for "make world")?  Or is 
> the /usr/obj filesystem the only big optimization available?


No, I run on a stock -current system, no fancy mods or anything..

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Søren Schmidt               (sos@FreeBSD.org)               FreeBSD Core Team
                Even more code to hack -- will it ever end
..