Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 12:26:11 -0400 From: Christopher Sean Hilton <chris@vindaloo.com> To: "Johan Hendriks" <Johan@double-l.nl> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Does softupdate help squid ? Message-ID: <632D48BA-ADCC-4E0F-AFE9-46806B0B1AD7@vindaloo.com> In-Reply-To: <57200BF94E69E54880C9BB1AF714BBCB5DDCA8@w2003s01.double-l.local> References: <47DE312E.2030209@esiee.fr> <AFEDF01E-ECB0-43E9-9F64-E678FA88E644@vindaloo.com> <57200BF94E69E54880C9BB1AF714BBCB5DDCA8@w2003s01.double-l.local>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mar 17, 2008, at 11:51 AM, Johan Hendriks wrote: > Squid is a forward proxy whereas varnish is just a reverse proxy > > So you can not use it for for lan to wan proxy! > Thanks for the enlightenment. My understanding is that Squid can do both forward and reverse proxy. At least it it would seem so since that's the way I'm using it. I did not know that varnish cannot be used as a forward proxy though. As I said before, varnish is on my list of things to investigate since it seems to have a much more modern design than squid. -- Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?632D48BA-ADCC-4E0F-AFE9-46806B0B1AD7>