Date: 30 Nov 2000 13:08:21 +0100 From: Cyrille Lefevre <clefevre@citeweb.net> To: Jason R Mastaler <jason@mastaler.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NetBSD package system features Message-ID: <4s0py85m.fsf@gits.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: Jason R Mastaler's message of "29 Nov 2000 22:28:07 -0700" References: <00112811292900.19785@nightshade> <20001128231806.A318@ringworld.oblivion.bg> <200011282208.eASM8lO60591@bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com> <20001129002142.B318@ringworld.oblivion.bg> <x7wvdmav14.fsf@aguirre.la.mastaler.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jason R Mastaler <jason@mastaler.com> writes: > Peter Pentchev <roam@orbitel.bg> writes: > > > I might even go so far in my enthusiasm as to actually draft some > > kind of update utility (I do not feel all that warm and fuzzy about > > mucking up /usr/ports/Mk makefiles :) > > I don't understand this. It seems more useful to create an "update" > make target instead of detaching the functionality into yet another > (un)maintained utility. > > What does Bruce and others think about this? consider someone who doesn't have the ports tree and which only install binary ports from CDs or whatever. so, something like pkg_add -u is required. Cyrille. -- home: mailto:clefevre@citeweb.net work: mailto:Cyrille.Lefevre@edf.fr To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4s0py85m.fsf>