From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Dec 3 08:52:38 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id IAA28368 for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 3 Dec 1996 08:52:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from dyson.iquest.net ([198.70.144.127]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id IAA28357 for ; Tue, 3 Dec 1996 08:52:34 -0800 (PST) Received: (from root@localhost) by dyson.iquest.net (8.8.2/8.6.9) id LAA01608; Tue, 3 Dec 1996 11:51:55 -0500 (EST) From: John Dyson Message-Id: <199612031651.LAA01608@dyson.iquest.net> Subject: Re: 2.2-current page fault panics To: mark@plato.salford.ac.uk (Mark Powell) Date: Tue, 3 Dec 1996 11:51:55 -0500 (EST) Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: from "Mark Powell" at Dec 3, 96 04:33:16 pm Reply-To: dyson@freebsd.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24 ME8] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > Been running 2.2-960801-SNAP since in came out with no problems. Wanted to > get current so I pulled down the source and applied all the ctm updates > as of yesterday. The new kernel now falls over under high disk activity/load. > Going back to the 960801-SNAP returns me to a stable system. It's a PCI > Pentium 166 with a AHA 7880 on board. Is this trace of the lastest vmcore > useful? > The trace is very useful, what kinds of things was your system doing? John