From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 24 20:17:08 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5739216A41C for ; Tue, 24 May 2005 20:17:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nexus@hoth.amu.edu.pl) Received: from hoth.amu.edu.pl (hoth.amu.edu.pl [150.254.110.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF38143D4C for ; Tue, 24 May 2005 20:17:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nexus@hoth.amu.edu.pl) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hoth.amu.edu.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68F8710E40B; Tue, 24 May 2005 22:17:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hoth.amu.edu.pl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (hoth.amu.edu.pl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 34830-02-12; Tue, 24 May 2005 22:17:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from aristo (hoth.amu.edu.pl [150.254.110.14]) by hoth.amu.edu.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC76E10E405; Tue, 24 May 2005 22:17:02 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 22:17:01 +0200 From: Bohdan Horst To: Kris Kennaway Message-ID: <20050524201701.GB35326@aristo> References: <20050524193117.GA35326@aristo> <20050524193707.GA11906@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050524193707.GA11906@xor.obsecurity.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at hoth.amu.edu.pl Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Performance of 4.x vs 5.x (nbench results) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 20:17:08 -0000 On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 12:37:08PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > Thanks, but if the machines are not completely idle then it's > impossible to tell whether these numbers are meaningful :-( nbench give almost exact results under load : (1,2,3 nbenchs running) load 1: 496.1 load 2: 497.7 load 3: 498.78 and all machines have load: 4.11: 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.11: 0.03 0.03 0.03 5.4: 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.4: 0.00 0.00 0.00 regards -- Bohdan 'Nexus' Horst