Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 21:48:49 +0200 From: Rainer Duffner <rainer@ultra-secure.de> To: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NFS Performance issue against NetApp Message-ID: <C40EB001-4790-4BB9-A580-6D57D2CBC340@ultra-secure.de> In-Reply-To: <C643EE8D-5934-48EA-9305-EE6A07C5C897@hub.org> References: <4F9A2AAE-938F-4FF5-A30C-72689D7F1F39@hub.org> <20130424093505.0f3e4415@suse3> <C643EE8D-5934-48EA-9305-EE6A07C5C897@hub.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Am 24.04.2013 um 18:26 schrieb "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>: > > On 2013-04-24, at 24:35 , Rainer Duffner <rainer@ultra-secure.de> wrote: > >> Am Tue, 23 Apr 2013 16:25:56 -0700 >> schrieb "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>: >> >>> >>> Morning … >>> >>> I'm trying to figure out where performance issues are arising, and >>> I suspect its a lack of tuning on the FreeBSD side … >>> >>> Hardware wise, I have an HP Proliant DL360p Gen8 Server, 16G of >>> RAM, bge ethernet … I have two ethernet ports in use, one used as a >>> private backend for the NFS filer, the other for the public IP front >>> end. >> >> How did you get bge working on a Gen8 Proliant anyway? > > Not too painfully … 9.1-RELEASE didn't work, but I tar'd up and put onto a usb stick -STABLE, and installed that, and its been fine since … > >> AFAIK, the stock bge of 9.1 doesn't have support for the bcm-chips in >> those servers. >> >> Can you try an Intel NIC? > > That one could be more difficult, since don't have any of those laying about … but will definitely try and come up with something, thx ... > >> I have to cap RSIZE/WSIZE at 32k to get *any* kind of performance from > > 'k, what do you mean by cap? setting it in /etc/fstab? or using sysctl variables? > > In the NFS mount options. I've re-done my tests and it still seems to be a problem. Rainer
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?C40EB001-4790-4BB9-A580-6D57D2CBC340>