From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Feb  8  2:54:56 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from hermes.research.kpn.com (hermes.research.kpn.com [139.63.192.8])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10D8B37B401
	for <hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu,  8 Feb 2001 02:54:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from l04.research.kpn.com (l04.research.kpn.com [139.63.192.204])
 by research.kpn.com (PMDF V5.2-31 #42699)
 with ESMTP id <01JZV7KI263E000AEN@research.kpn.com> for hackers@FreeBSD.ORG;
 Thu, 8 Feb 2001 11:54:32 +0100
Received: by l04.research.kpn.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
	id <DN5PVH5M>; Thu, 08 Feb 2001 11:54:32 +0100
Content-return: allowed
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2001 11:54:31 +0100
From: "Koster, K.J." <K.J.Koster@kpn.com>
Subject: RE: syscall kernel modules on 3.0-release
To: 'Dan Feldman' <protozoa@ghs.ssd.k12.wa.us>,
	Matthew Emmerton <matt@gsicomp.on.ca>
Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Message-id: <59063B5B4D98D311BC0D0001FA7E4522026D7BD6@l04.research.kpn.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-type: text/plain;	charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> 
> Hmm, I have exactly the same situation, a mission-critical server that
> can't be taken offline to do an upgrade. It's running 3.4, 
> but with a few binaries from 4.0 that I needed to make our CGIs work 
> (development is done on 4.2 :).
>
Euh... Mission Critical(tm) without a backup machine? Your boss did sign the
"will not whine when it dies"--agreement, right?

    Kees Jan

================================================
 You are only young once,
       but you can stay immature all your life.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message