Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2016 09:55:56 +0100 From: Andrea Venturoli <ml@netfence.it> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The ports collection has some serious issues Message-ID: <569b4856-41f2-fbde-dc2c-0fa01efab84b@netfence.it> In-Reply-To: <CAJ_iqtYNLyeTWeQxckxmOoswAEaQYpkkUA20_ERkg0BaSnohgw@mail.gmail.com> References: <c5bc24cc-5293-252b-ddbc-1e94a17ca3a8@openmailbox.org> <20161208085926.GC2691@gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.20.1612150722250.36773@wonkity.com> <3b00e76a-7a97-aa1b-72e9-236161044c3b@m5p.com> <20161215183122.GG5268@pol-server.leissner.se> <20161216054202.GC75755@server.rulingia.com> <CAJ_iqtYNLyeTWeQxckxmOoswAEaQYpkkUA20_ERkg0BaSnohgw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12/16/16 07:42, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: > FWIW, I'm a happy portupgrade user. Me too. I just frequently run into a bug: when icu is updated, somehow the old libraries are not saved and all ports depending on icu break. Now I know that I should take care with that single port. Also, I wish I would be to be able to "portupgrade" a jail, i.e. running portupgrade in base and update the ports inside jails, without the need to install portupgrade (and ruby and every other dependency) in the jail. That said, I've been considering the move to poudriere, but that's a low priority task. bye av.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?569b4856-41f2-fbde-dc2c-0fa01efab84b>