From owner-freebsd-current  Sun Mar 11 12:58:49 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from feral.com (feral.com [192.67.166.1])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0794A37B719
	for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 11 Mar 2001 12:58:45 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from mjacob@feral.com)
Received: from zeppo.feral.com (IDENT:mjacob@zeppo [192.67.166.71])
	by feral.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA31506;
	Sun, 11 Mar 2001 12:55:22 -0800
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 12:55:19 -0800 (PST)
From: Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com>
Reply-To: mjacob@feral.com
To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>
Cc: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>,
	Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>,
	"Niels Chr. Bank-Pedersen" <ncbp@bank-pedersen.dk>,
	current@FreeBSD.ORG, Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com>
Subject: Re: how's vinum these days with DEVFS (second part)
In-Reply-To: <xzpelw4hvxy.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0103111253310.29879-100000@zeppo.feral.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


> Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com> writes:
> > Hmm. Sounds to me more like an argument for requiring devfs if you
> > use vinum.
> 
> Not until vinum works equally well with devfs as without it.

Har har har har har............

Almost a Catch-22... "We have to do really wierd things so vinum will work
equally well without devfs as with it... so we can, then,.... remove all the
wierd things we did to make vinum work equally well without devfs as with
it"...

I think what you really meant to say was "No, we won't require devfs".




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message