From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 1 16:59:41 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D615116A41F for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 16:59:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BEBA43D4C for ; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 16:59:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A70F9603F; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 11:59:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 14860-06; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 11:59:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-68-161-122-227.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.122.227]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3BF2603D; Thu, 1 Dec 2005 11:59:37 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <438F2BFD.9030408@mac.com> Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2005 11:59:41 -0500 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brian Candler References: <20051201095426.GD17378@uk.tiscali.com> In-Reply-To: <20051201095426.GD17378@uk.tiscali.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: current@ and freebsd-current@ X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2005 16:59:41 -0000 Brian Candler wrote: > I see a number of mails cross-posted to current@freebsd.org and > freebsd-current@freebsd.org, and so get two copies in the freebsd-current > digest I receive. > > Is there any reason to have two addresses pointing at this list? As far as I > can see from the web, 'freebsd-current@' is the advertised address. If > current@ is a legacy hangover, could it be killed? I've asked postmaster@ about this, and there are mechanisms in place which are supposed to merge the two names to avoid duplicate postings, but some messages seem to get missed. -- -Chuck