From owner-freebsd-jobs@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jun 15 16:21:42 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-jobs@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-jobs@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-jobs@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2886716A41C;
	Wed, 15 Jun 2005 16:21:42 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from francisco@natserv.net)
Received: from mail1.acecape.com (mail1.acecape.com [66.114.74.12])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDB7643D49;
	Wed, 15 Jun 2005 16:21:41 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from francisco@natserv.net)
Received: from zoraida.natserv.net (p65-147.acedsl.com [66.114.65.147])
	by mail1.acecape.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j5FGLeLU012435;
	Wed, 15 Jun 2005 12:21:40 -0400
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 12:21:40 -0400 (EDT)
From: Francisco <francisco@natserv.net>
X-X-Sender: fran@zoraida.natserv.net
To: Stephan Wehner <stephanwehner@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <e66d1efb0506150902256af30e@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20050615121942.K90275@zoraida.natserv.net>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0506151147490.3109@twin.ccmr.cornell.edu>
	<20050615155534.GN87251@elvis.mu.org>
	<e66d1efb0506150902256af30e@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Cc: Alfred Perlstein <alfred@freebsd.org>, freebsd-jobs@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Time to moderate this list?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-jobs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Jobs offered and sought <freebsd-jobs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-jobs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-jobs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-jobs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-jobs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-jobs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-jobs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-jobs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 16:21:42 -0000

On Wed, 15 Jun 2005, Stephan Wehner wrote:

> How about returning postings that don't contain the term "Location" --
> and explain why they are returned. Simple and not always applicable,
> but probably effective.

Given the little traffic on this list I don't even see why people get so 
frustrated. Of all the issues with email (spam, phising, viruses, etc))... 
requesting to someone to post the location of a job is not that bad.