From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri Mar 29 09:24:21 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id JAA03582
          for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 29 Mar 1996 09:24:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id JAA03501
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Fri, 29 Mar 1996 09:24:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id KAA05741; Fri, 29 Mar 1996 10:20:23 -0700
From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
Message-Id: <199603291720.KAA05741@phaeton.artisoft.com>
Subject: Re: FreeBSD performance vs BSD/OS
To: andreas@knobel.gun.de (Andreas Klemm)
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 1996 10:20:22 -0700 (MST)
Cc: mrcpu@cdsnet.net, hackers@FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.92.960329075940.206B-100000@knobel.gun.de> from "Andreas Klemm" at Mar 29, 96 08:01:28 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> > W/o any real hard numbers, I noticed that when running the perl 5.002
> > testsuite that BSD/OS 2.0 on a P5-90 runs the tests more quickly than my
> > P5-120 running -stable.
> >
> >
> > BSD/OS 2.0.1 numbers for make test:
> > All tests successful.
> > u=0.65  s=1.03333  cu=11.8667  cs=12.6833  files=94  tests=2105
> >
> > FreeBSD 2.1-stable numbers:
> > All tests successful.
> > u=1  s=1.8  cu=26.0667  cs=15.5  files=94  tests=2103
> 
> All tests successful.
> u=0.8  s=0.483333  cu=19.6667  cs=7.01667  files=94  tests=2103
> 
> FreeBSD-current, CFLAGS -> -pipe -m486 -O2
> ASUS TP4XE, 100MHz Pentium, 256k burst cache...

HZ values?


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.