From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Apr 9 04:58:00 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id EAA14465 for questions-outgoing; Wed, 9 Apr 1997 04:58:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nic.follonett.no (nic.follonett.no [194.198.43.10]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id EAA14460 for ; Wed, 9 Apr 1997 04:57:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by nic.follonett.no (8.8.5/8.8.3) with UUCP id NAA16416; Wed, 9 Apr 1997 13:55:05 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from eivind@localhost) by dimaga.com (8.7.5/8.7.2) id MAA04199; Wed, 9 Apr 1997 12:50:32 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Wed, 9 Apr 1997 12:50:32 +0200 (MET DST) From: Eivind Eklund To: Jimbo Bahooli cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipnat + natd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Tue, 8 Apr 1997, Jimbo Bahooli wrote: > I have tried both ipnat (ipfilter) and natd (from www.srv.net/~cmott) for > ip aliasing purposes. Both have worked somewhat to a degree. However, > both went extremely slowly, 20bytes/sec was about averaged for any host > behind me. Also tcpdump would spit out ip reassembly time exceeded > messages. I am wondering if anyone else has had this problem. The connect > to the internet is 28.8 ppp, and ethernet for the aliased hosts. The > kernel is 2.2-STABLE and the newest ipfilter and natd are being used. This is strange. I'm running the same aliasing code as natd (using user-land PPP) and get about 3KB/s from aliased hosts. What kind of CPU power have you got? (I'm aliasing about 20 hosts on a Pentium 150, which is also running as a file/printer/CPU-server, without any noticable load) Eivind Eklund http://maybe.yes.no/perhaps/