From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 16 13:27:50 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED88F16A4CE for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 13:27:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.ncsa.uiuc.edu (mail.ncsa.uiuc.edu [141.142.2.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BEE043D1F for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 13:27:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from koziol@ncsa.uiuc.edu) X-Envelope-From: koziol@ncsa.uiuc.edu X-Envelope-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from sleipnir.ncsa.uiuc.edu (sleipnir.ncsa.uiuc.edu [141.142.96.70]) by mail.ncsa.uiuc.edu (8.11.7/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i1GLRjc30284; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 15:27:45 -0600 Received: from sleipnir.ncsa.uiuc.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i1GLRj5D056987; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 15:27:45 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from koziol@sleipnir.ncsa.uiuc.edu) Received: (from koziol@localhost) by sleipnir.ncsa.uiuc.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i1GLRjIS056986; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 15:27:45 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from koziol) From: Quincey Koziol Message-Id: <200402162127.i1GLRjIS056986@sleipnir.ncsa.uiuc.edu> In-Reply-To: To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 15:27:45 -0600 (CST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL99f (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Aligning GENERIC with NOTES? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 21:27:51 -0000 [ Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, converting... ] > Quincey Koziol writes: > > > In that case, change NOTES rather than GENERIC. > > Hmm, what's your reasoning behind doing it this way? The NOTES files > > appear to be better organized than GENERIC... > > A lot of people have kernel configs derived from GENERIC. If you > rearrange GENERIC too much, they'll have a hard time keeping track. Ah. :-( I understand this reason, but this will be spreading the poorly organized format of GENERIC into the better organized format of the NOTES files. Not something I think is a good idea and I won't proceed if that's the general consensus... I do think that re-organizing GENERIC before 5-CURRENT becomes 5-STABLE would be a long-term good thing and I'd be willing to donate my time toward doing. Quincey