From owner-freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Mon Nov 27 15:21:20 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CF3CE54786; Mon, 27 Nov 2017 15:21:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonathan@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [96.47.72.132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CE5576782; Mon, 27 Nov 2017 15:21:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonathan@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [134.153.27.124] (unknown [127.0.1.132]) by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFBB35A85; Mon, 27 Nov 2017 15:21:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonathan@FreeBSD.org) From: "Jonathan Anderson" To: "Bill Sorenson" Cc: mike@karels.net, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, "Benno Rice" , freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The future of fortune(6) Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 11:50:46 -0330 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: <66D39828-ADBA-4973-BEB8-B2F6657E9996@FreeBSD.org> <201711261832.vAQIWNaV006777@mail.KARELS.NET> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-Mailer: MailMate (1.9.7r5425) X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 15:21:20 -0000 On 27 Nov 2017, at 1:01, Bill Sorenson wrote: > I for one would recommend leaving things alone unless it is a > substantive improvement. That's a sound principle, but if we move the datfiles (other than `freebsd-tips`) into ports, we could take all of the future time we would otherwise spend debating fortune(6) and use it for... anything else. :) I would call that a substantive improvement. Jon -- Jonathan Anderson jonathan@FreeBSD.org