Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 11:50:46 -0330 From: "Jonathan Anderson" <jonathan@FreeBSD.org> To: "Bill Sorenson" <instructionset@gmail.com> Cc: mike@karels.net, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, "Benno Rice" <benno@freebsd.org>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The future of fortune(6) Message-ID: <C8A9F707-91D4-4B05-A9E4-E85AC86E5985@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CACcTwY=r2=V8yd5WiP_iTV_oaThub9toOEbqET0givPwmVJQpg@mail.gmail.com> References: <66D39828-ADBA-4973-BEB8-B2F6657E9996@FreeBSD.org> <201711261832.vAQIWNaV006777@mail.KARELS.NET> <CACcTwY=r2=V8yd5WiP_iTV_oaThub9toOEbqET0givPwmVJQpg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 27 Nov 2017, at 1:01, Bill Sorenson wrote: > I for one would recommend leaving things alone unless it is a > substantive improvement. That's a sound principle, but if we move the datfiles (other than `freebsd-tips`) into ports, we could take all of the future time we would otherwise spend debating fortune(6) and use it for... anything else. :) I would call that a substantive improvement. Jon -- Jonathan Anderson jonathan@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?C8A9F707-91D4-4B05-A9E4-E85AC86E5985>