From owner-freebsd-current Wed Dec 1 12:38:12 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from pau-amma.whistle.com (pau-amma.whistle.com [207.76.205.64]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8116715187 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 12:37:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dhw@whistle.com) Received: (from dhw@localhost) by pau-amma.whistle.com (8.9.2/8.9.2) id MAA23920; Wed, 1 Dec 1999 12:37:27 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 1 Dec 1999 12:37:27 -0800 (PST) From: David Wolfskill Message-Id: <199912012037.MAA23920@pau-amma.whistle.com> To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu Subject: Re: removing enigma(1) In-Reply-To: <199912012020.MAA06160@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >From: Steve Kargl >Date: Wed, 1 Dec 1999 12:20:19 -0800 (PST) >With the FreeBSD 4.0 code freeze fast approaching, are there any >compelling reasons to keep enigma (src/usr.bin/enigma) in the >source tree? Yes, I know it is a *small* utility, but >1. it provides rather weak encryption, >2. the crypto-distribution is available with stronger encryption, and >3. src/ports/security contains stronger encryption schemes. Maybe relocate it to games.... :-)/2, david -- David Wolfskill dhw@whistle.com UNIX System Administrator voice: (650) 577-7158 pager: (888) 347-0197 FAX: (650) 372-5915 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message