From owner-freebsd-bugs Fri Jul 21 2:21:27 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3428F37B83B; Fri, 21 Jul 2000 02:21:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sheldonh@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from sheldonh@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id CAA04395; Fri, 21 Jul 2000 02:21:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sheldonh@FreeBSD.org) Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2000 02:21:25 -0700 (PDT) From: Message-Id: <200007210921.CAA04395@freefall.freebsd.org> To: abeaupre@chemcomp.com, sheldonh@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bin/20062: New (?) package management utilities Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Synopsis: New (?) package management utilities State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: sheldonh State-Changed-When: Fri Jul 21 02:18:54 PDT 2000 State-Changed-Why: What's really needed is for the _existing_ package management tools to be extended as required. Providing a pantheon of management utilities, each of which duplicates in some way the functionality of at least one other, is not the way to go. However, if you're not up to that task but still think your suite of scripts is useful, you should probably submit them as a port. Please see: http://www.freebsd.org/porters-handbook/ http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=20062 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message