From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Sat Feb 27 07:28:26 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3F6555E161 for ; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 07:28:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Received: from mail-qv1-xf2c.google.com (mail-qv1-xf2c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f2c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DndRZ4Rg6z4XGV for ; Sat, 27 Feb 2021 07:28:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Received: by mail-qv1-xf2c.google.com with SMTP id gi9so5699118qvb.10 for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 23:28:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=PjzPxC4NVRtP1o1ePurNdk0nPJcQYJDdqJqqGuG7Yq8=; b=bhEv2kG9FOtUBf+bE967gZ7uqmnCg+N7j4kcPqhAVWF2DiL84HL+fcdVG0fQPqj1Zc bTSiIxWVmX6wcIhrxLiX9lwW1jhKJMljocAbH6sh8G+VJdbpzEH55pGey77coFeWaW31 nEB63S2c48URSE4HD4gx9jSJ85Fiav7wCyA1gEbCqg8cDvrLV5bXZdW3dC47znDQGir2 DSF06G99OZdjiiW/prWMc8Z/Wwr8Tnd7wNlNls1pu5JgMUUlgRNu1tLBKXDrOXzJ9+W1 ISPapIRwoigWqhJ9O/4jhh+6uiI9X4hKY6NDC4+jgnfjlg0QBzNvhlpFpoYJygrApyKi 1hZA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=PjzPxC4NVRtP1o1ePurNdk0nPJcQYJDdqJqqGuG7Yq8=; b=m9DLQ1eWMkBME6wi9lIXmLvlEs+tIJRy09PkyuJEQoPZQ+1Qdj/Y/Aul1Z7Fm+lgNZ JP9P3b6zW3fXGhV78yu2lCl+YTuvAtDVq/QO7dU7agSg+dESrqEiKdO5rrKljVmh0QBe QN/wH3+SXQYJuNR7JYQqBL3VdyyEO8JxmmnCTFtrc3w+zr0Jh2cmDHZZYvEsP/MyvVuI Uy9LhEsuLhwkjLy+1UhlP9d8vlhoxhn7u458lfjk0hZQc9Qvqhl95HBITCCYzWgD/2J8 vYVrYvDVIJc3m4Sias9ExtQcxyOJe0bLJmzjIwuNazljymucYbnMlZD/3UIrciUjzpRY LcHA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533ynBtngxafsxqMF0ngLSI8/Uc/2j91jm3gYuva9KH/CB5uABXr shH3W3FmyKExXCJWwOT8wKrFq/iusYXjZcSN+AaZSg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyEd/AVEWbJrkKp//mdYvfV18TwVrnynU8dNZdRRCETGgFtMR8yNq3G85X69umym6GbSDBHxlCBAu+OV60qjdg= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:174d:: with SMTP id dc13mr5941570qvb.62.1614410905892; Fri, 26 Feb 2021 23:28:25 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <202102261710.11QHAVLY062611@nuc.oldach.net> In-Reply-To: From: Warner Losh Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2021 00:28:14 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: How do I know if my 13-stable has security patches? To: Kevin Oberman Cc: Ed Maste , Helge Oldach , freebsd-stable stable X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4DndRZ4Rg6z4XGV X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.34 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2021 07:28:26 -0000 On Sat, Feb 27, 2021 at 12:15 AM Kevin Oberman wrote: > Well, back to a full clone. Thanks for the "--unshallow" argument, but so > far it has failed twice. I suspect that it's my urtwn interface is bad. > I'll swap it out tomorrow and see it that fixes it. > > I am a bit surprised at how little more space the full clone takes. I was > really expecting it to be much worse. Of course, it will only grow... as > will the sources, themselves. > > Warner, I suggest an immediate update to your mini-git primer. It was > already a bit out of date, but this fix is more urgent with RC on the > horizon. In particular, the "Repositories" at least look old to me. > First quick pass done. Please let me know what you think. You can suggest edits right on the github site (they turn into pull requests) or you can send me suggestions directly. Warner > -- > Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer > E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com > PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 > > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 10:55 AM Ed Maste wrote: > > > On Fri, 26 Feb 2021 at 12:10, Helge Oldach wrote: > > > > > > A shallow tree is about 1.6G. If you want to patch source (say, from > > > a SA or EN) you certainly also need space for an object tree which is > > > about 4.5G. The total is >6G. > > > > > > I'd say relative to the total required to build, the 1.1G "savings" > from > > > using a shallow versus a full tree (which is about 2.7G) isn't really > > > worth the effort. Plus, you get the a few benefits like full commit > > > history including comments. > > > > Indeed, this is a good point. We can update docs to state: > > > > At present a full clone is required to include the commit count in > > uname. An existing shallow clone can be converted into a full clone by > > running > > > > % git fetch --unshallow > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org > " > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >