From owner-freebsd-alpha Wed Oct 18 11:12: 6 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from post.mail.nl.demon.net (post-11.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 866B037B4E5 for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 11:12:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [212.238.54.101] (helo=freebie.demon.nl) by post.mail.nl.demon.net with smtp (Exim 3.14 #4) id 13lxcY-000MQw-00; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 18:07:22 +0000 Received: (from wkb@localhost) by freebie.demon.nl (8.11.0/8.11.0) id e9IHQLK03689; Wed, 18 Oct 2000 19:26:21 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wkb) Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 19:26:21 +0200 From: Wilko Bulte To: Mike Eldridge Cc: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Alpha 4.x releases (production quality?) Message-ID: <20001018192621.D1832@freebie.demon.nl> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: ; from diz@cafes.net on Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 09:54:20AM -0500 X-OS: FreeBSD 4.1-STABLE X-PGP: finger wilko@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 09:54:20AM -0500, Mike Eldridge wrote: > On Wed, 18 Oct 2000, Kris Kirby wrote: > > Would a general concensus of the folks on -alpha agree that FreeBSD 4.x > > for the Alpha is stable enough for a production server? > > I wouldn't. I can't even get the thing installed. The kernel panics as > it's trying to boot. Linux runs fine on it. I've looked for help, but I On 'it'? Please #define 'it' ? -- Wilko Bulte wilko@freebsd.org Arnhem, the Netherlands To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message