From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 20 13:37:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BE6D16A4CE for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 13:37:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 727AF43D2D for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 13:37:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i8KDbDkU002852; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 15:37:13 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: Roman Kurakin From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 20 Sep 2004 17:07:41 +0400." <414ED61D.5080607@cronyx.ru> Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 15:37:13 +0200 Message-ID: <2850.1095687433@critter.freebsd.dk> Sender: phk@critter.freebsd.dk cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] naming of tty devices. X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 13:37:19 -0000 In message <414ED61D.5080607@cronyx.ru>, Roman Kurakin writes: >Just an idea: > > Why not to add some general device enumeration for all devices, >especially >if devices would behave the same? > >tty%{global_port} >cua%{global_port} This doesn't work. There _are_ differences between serial devices and for instance PTYs or NMDM devices have very particular semantics. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.