From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri May 13 18:09:37 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id F273F16A4CE; Fri, 13 May 2005 18:09:36 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from www.portaone.com (web.portaone.com [195.70.151.35])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 4D8B043D83; Fri, 13 May 2005 18:09:36 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from [192.168.4.107] (039sub211.uottawa.ca [137.122.39.144])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by www.portaone.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j4DI9VC1057740
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Fri, 13 May 2005 20:09:34 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from sobomax@FreeBSD.org)
Message-ID: <4284ED54.9010603@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 21:09:24 +0300
From: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu>
References: <200410020349.i923nG8v021675@northstar.hetzel.org>
	<20041002052856.GE17792@nexus.dglawrence.com>
	<p0611041fbd848f6aa55d@[128.113.24.47]>
	<20041002233542.GL714@nexus.dglawrence.com>
	<p0620076ebe2490ccdc00@[128.113.24.47]>
	<p06210225be4307a39100@[128.113.24.47]> <421DAD8F.6000704@portaone.com>
	<p0621024bbe482b50f150@[128.113.24.47]> <4284D038.50805@FreeBSD.org>
	<p0621020dbeaa836cd61a@[128.113.24.47]> <4284D4BC.9070705@FreeBSD.org>
	<p0621020fbeaa86c39e7d@[128.113.24.47]>
In-Reply-To: <p0621020fbeaa86c39e7d@[128.113.24.47]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.83/876/Fri May 13 01:14:29 2005 on www.portaone.com
X-Virus-Status: Clean
cc: Paul Saab <ps@FreeBSD.org>
cc: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Bug in #! processing - One More Time
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture
	<freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 18:09:37 -0000

Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> At 7:24 PM +0300 5/13/05, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> 
>> Garance A Drosihn wrote:
>>
>>> At 7:05 PM +0300 5/13/05, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
>>>
>>>> Attached please find patch which rips any special processing of
>>>> command line arguments. It should put FreeBSD into the very same
>>>> ship with the rest of unices and linuces out there.
>>>
>>>
>>> Actually, thanks to a message from Paul Saab last weekend, I've
>>> been working on this change for much of the past week.
>>
>>
>> Well, let's agree that if I don't hear from you for another 2 days
>> I'll commit my change, OK?
> 
> 
> I should have done enough testing by Sunday evening to say something,
> one way or another.  Sure.

Good, since this issue has been taking too much time to fix.

> Note that I'm not just "running this through buildworld".  That's how
> all the previous changes were tested, too.  I have a whole battery of
> tests that I've been slogging through.  And most the time I've been
> doing that, I've been muttering to myself "How did I talk myself into
> this?"...

Well, I'd suggest you to put those tests into src/tools/regression, to 
ensure that this won't be broken occasionally in the future.

-Maxim