From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 17 23:00:19 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA901606; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 23:00:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.e.sanliturk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vc0-f182.google.com (mail-vc0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 610A18FC16; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 23:00:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vc0-f182.google.com with SMTP id fy27so5907188vcb.13 for ; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 15:00:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=YoX1V7P7JeMUQeP1FPGr9McxkgLJYZ0DJWNo/0HcXpc=; b=Zj0P69aZ9CR1yR5VamTOu8vmlfbX7PMT1UVXxniYV3bISa+6TDcCWzj1TQeoQfHdxT ekZlGcsWH1U1bPzSuWeYEvxdBjhXFbX1K4/u5jbO6tpk61GKYiDKCQpIbMAdbMurj2rk CJb4DyIxrpKI3BRKfae8roDmX5fJUAnthkwyCObFfm3ggxC4G/U8gWiAAitYwZ6BTz4n 5J1VALUiJrVRSvTcUXEo7chx1MJA6pJLHEShzGMa3WG65wjIyaLP+UHYhUjb13/xQET0 dimO7T4AyMwTLbeTBsCoOQULYx+fun8+XbGJyufz8O1papbUkGSC5Wki2t8mae7JKjwj /dCA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.93.41 with SMTP id cr9mr21088763vdb.118.1355785218551; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 15:00:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.58.218.35 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Dec 2012 15:00:18 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1469458445.1458725.1355782970762.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca> References: <1469458445.1458725.1355782970762.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca> Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 15:00:18 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: iSCSI vs. SMB with ZFS. From: Mehmet Erol Sanliturk To: Rick Macklem Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: Wojciech Puchar , Zaphod Beeblebrox , Ivan Voras , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 23:00:19 -0000 On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Rick Macklem wrote: > Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote: > > Does windows 7 support nfs v4, then? Is it expected (ie: is it > > worthwhile > > trying) that nfsv4 would perform at a similar speed to iSCSI? It would > > seem that this at least requires active directory (or this user name > > mapping ... which I remember being hard). > > As far as I know, there is no NFSv4 in Windows. I only made the comment > (which I admit was a bit off topic), because the previous post had stated > "SMB or NFS, they're the same" or something like that.) > > There was work on an NFSv4 client for Windows being done by CITI at the > Univ. of Michigan funded by Microsoft research, but I have no idea if it > was ever released. > > rick > > > > > http://www.citi.umich.edu/projects/nfsv4/ Projects: NFS Version 4 Open Source Reference Implementation We are developing an implementation of NFSv4 and NFSv4.1 for Linux http://www.citi.umich.edu/projects/nfsv4/windows/ http://www.citi.umich.edu/projects/nfsv4/windows/readme.html http://www.citi.umich.edu/projects/ Thank you very much . Mehmet Erol Sanliturk