From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Nov 10 18:34:55 1996 Return-Path: owner-ports Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id SAA06496 for ports-outgoing; Sun, 10 Nov 1996 18:34:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from relay.nuxi.com (nuxi.cs.ucdavis.edu [128.120.56.38]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id SAA06491 for ; Sun, 10 Nov 1996 18:34:53 -0800 (PST) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by relay.nuxi.com (8.7.5/8.6.12) id SAA18812; Sun, 10 Nov 1996 18:35:05 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199611110235.SAA18812@relay.nuxi.com> Date: Sun, 10 Nov 1996 18:35:05 -0800 From: obrien@NUXI.com (David E. O'Brien) To: dbabler@Rigel.orionsys.com (Dave Babler) Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: wwwcount-2.3 References: <199611110010.QAA18382@relay.nuxi.com> X-Mailer: Mutt 0.48.1-PL0 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-PGP-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Keyid: 34F9F9D5 In-Reply-To: ; from Dave Babler on Nov 10, 1996 17:44:47 -0800 Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hum... I would write the port maintainer. The Lynx devel team, has a real nasty habit of changing the code w/o changing the distname. Thus why we don't generate an MD5 checksum for Lynx anymore. >From your output, I'd say the patch no longer applies to the version of lynx you fetched. The port maintainer could probably track this down pretty fast. -- -- David (obrien@cs.ucdavis.edu)