From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 20 21:20:40 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63DF916A4DB for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 21:20:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.cableone.net (scanmail2.cableone.net [24.116.0.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08DB043D3F for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 21:20:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from v.velox@vvelox.net) Received: from vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net (unverified [24.119.62.13]) by smail2.cableone.net (SurgeMail 1.9b) with ESMTP id 18375769 for multiple; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 14:04:29 -0700 Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 16:20:03 -0500 From: Vulpes Velox To: Benjamin Walkenhorst Message-ID: <20040920162003.1583186a@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> In-Reply-To: <20040920175652.4ecc141e.krylon@gmx.net> References: <20040918165741.20d10137.krylon@gmx.net> <200409181101.25973.josh@tcbug.org> <20040918183953.0666ea91.krylon@gmx.net> <20040920175652.4ecc141e.krylon@gmx.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 0.9.12a (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.10) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Server: High Performance Mail Server - http://surgemail.com cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: X.org performance? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 21:20:40 -0000 On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 17:56:52 +0200 Benjamin Walkenhorst wrote: > Hello, > > On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 19:40:30 +0530 > Subhro wrote: > > > cat /etc/make.conf > > ------------------------ > PERL_VER=5.8.2 > PERL_VERSION=5.8.2 > PERL_ARCH=mach > NOPERL=yo > NO_PERL=yo > NO_PERL_WRAPPER=yo > > CPUTYPE=athlon-mp > > CFLAGS+= -O2 -pipe > X_WINDOW_SYSTEM=xorg > ------------------------ > > But like I said, I think I chose the wrong words - > X.org does not perform poorly, it's just that it sometimes will > use lots of CPU, and I am under the impression it does even more so > than XFree did. > Or is it just my perception kidding me? Try reworking a lot of thinks with out the -O2 flag. I've seen massive breakage caused by them, with little or no noticeable speed gain.