From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 26 20:24:10 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F15EF6E; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 20:24:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jim.harris@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vb0-f54.google.com (mail-vb0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79A348FC14; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 20:24:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vb0-f54.google.com with SMTP id v11so4383522vbm.13 for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 13:24:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=97R75LAU4i46//ZOv1pOt7wKXo6tBqaBrvyDYttbfL8=; b=pkMNB2dZI2JzKMMRoqcD71xxCPwWiOpnch26UyOVq+nj5UhA94AhBe4YJ/3vTItCNn 3RQe18YCaqRgNzfvK48stqp4YdMyoT6ejjkmlg0I4ICYXPP23dqgHmzavsG8plEaTAKL Um2TwabIJRPJLcvPvDXNjDvmHIQ2H48cAouxmKP7Sw3Gxct0ErpQ+nXb8YXIeRarRB3l D9xd7I2JJwBMFY06BV06NM9BnUgR4DlkeDSXvIppn52Fm66BgO5bfnGRJKelbT3rBHZA 287TCFuN6LL/iZg8FE9L2yqCytiSzaY8gX8RgR1NeX83GutkSn3+pzyoGcUTnSLJxuWL UCTw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.75.70 with SMTP id a6mr31659323vdw.5.1351283049579; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 13:24:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.58.225.2 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Oct 2012 13:24:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20121026201819.GF1563@funkthat.com> References: <505CC8EC.4030608@sentex.net> <505CE601.4070106@sentex.net> <505D0846.8050108@sentex.net> <20121026201819.GF1563@funkthat.com> Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 13:24:09 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: tws bug ? (LSI SAS 9750) From: Jim Harris To: Jim Harris , Mike Tancsa , FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List , delphij@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 20:24:11 -0000 On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 1:18 PM, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > > I'm seeing similar stuff on the hpt27xx driver: > (probe18:hpt27xx0:0:18:0): INQUIRY. CDB: 12 0 0 0 24 0 > (probe18:hpt27xx0:0:18:0): CAM status: Invalid Target ID > (probe18:hpt27xx0:0:18:0): Error 22, Unretryable error > > Should I make a similar change in sys/dev/hpt27xx/osm_bsd.c? Looks like > there are two CAM_TID_INVALID lines, but from reading the comments, only > the second one should change... > > Correct? If so, I'll try making the change and make sure everything > works well. > Yes - I agree that a similar change is needed, and only to the second one in that file.