From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 7 21:42:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BB7B16A4CE for ; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 21:42:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from itchy.rabson.org (mailgate.nlsystems.com [80.177.232.242]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F9E143D4C for ; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 21:42:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dfr@nlsystems.com) Received: from ns0.nlsystems.com (ns0.nlsystems.com [80.177.232.243]) by itchy.rabson.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i57Lbq9n001938; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 22:37:52 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from dfr@nlsystems.com) From: Doug Rabson To: Marcel Moolenaar Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 22:42:13 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.1 References: <1086625355.10911.39.camel@builder02.qubesoft.com> <20040607194237.GA10406@ns1.xcllnt.net> In-Reply-To: <20040607194237.GA10406@ns1.xcllnt.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200406072242.13393.dfr@nlsystems.com> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on itchy.rabson.org X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.71, clamav-milter version 0.71 X-Virus-Status: Clean cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP! KSE needs more attention X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 21:42:24 -0000 On Monday 07 June 2004 20:42, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 05:22:35PM +0100, Doug Rabson wrote: > > > > Actually its a bit better than that. It works for most use > > > > cases right now on i386 but would get confused on dlclose. I'll > > > > fix that before I move it into current. > > > > > > Does it work on static bound executables? > > > > Which one is static bound > > The executable; you know, no rtld. What I call complete executable to > distinguish it from static TLS on my page. Does static TLS work? > > See also: http://wiki.daemon.li/index.pl?ThreadLocalStorage No, this one is not yet supported. I think I can deal with this inside libc with some small support from the kernel (probably just to provide details of the TLS segment size etc.)