From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Dec 31 11:47:15 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail2.uniserve.com (mail2.uniserve.com [204.244.156.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AA7214F3E; Fri, 31 Dec 1999 11:47:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tom@uniserve.com) Received: from shell.uniserve.ca ([204.244.186.218]) by mail2.uniserve.com with smtp (Exim 3.03 #4) id 12480l-0004bV-00; Fri, 31 Dec 1999 11:46:55 -0800 Date: Fri, 31 Dec 1999 11:46:52 -0800 (PST) From: Tom X-Sender: tom@shell.uniserve.ca To: Matthew Dillon Cc: Peter Wemm , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: softupdates and debug.max_softdeps In-Reply-To: <199912311854.KAA84956@apollo.backplane.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 31 Dec 1999, Matthew Dillon wrote: > :FYI: On hub.freebsd.org (the freebsd mailing list server), if we activate > :softupdates on the disk containing the postfix spool, the machine reboots > :(silently if I recall correctly) within 5 minutes of postfix starting up. > : > :This is a much smaller system of course, with smaller memory and filesystem > :working set. (postfix spool of ~50-80MB, 256MB ram). I thought I'd post > :this as a real-use datapoint. > :Cheers, > :-Peter > :-- > :Peter Wemm - peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com; peter@netplex.com.au > :... > :Tom wrote: > :> Yes, postmark operates on the same file set. I used the following > :> postmark settings: > :> > :> set number 30000 > :> set transactions 4000000 > :> set size 1500 200000 > :... > > I'm running the postmark test on my 3.x and 4.x test boxes now using > a large softupdates partition (33G on each) and large memory (512M and 1G) > configuration. How many instances of postmark are you running? I used 4 separate instances (you must run them in separate directories). How fast are your disks? I used an external RAID-5 array that appears as single disk to FreeBSD. It is RAID-5, so the performance isn't that great for writing. I think my virtual disk is quite slow. If your system has fast disks, run more instances of postmark. > The 4.x box seems to have stabilized at around 14MB of KVM, the 3.x box > seems to have stabilized at around 9MB of KVM. I'll leave it running > for a while to see if there are any memory leaks and then try reducing > debug.max_softdeps to see what happens. > > We are still looking for panic messages. Well, I lost last nights panic because of fsck complaining about several million unreferenced files. I'm going to log to disk next time. > -Matt > Matthew Dillon > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > Tom Uniserve To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message