Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 29 Apr 1996 14:27:38 -0600
From:      DARREND@novell.com (Darren Davis)
To:        freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG, pvh@leftside.its.uct.ac.za, merblich@ossi.com
Subject:   Re: Compressing filesystem: Technical issues - Reply
Message-ID:  <s184d060.037@fromGW>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

>>> Mitchell Erblich <merblich@ossi.com>  4/29 12:51pm >>>
>Peter and et al,
>
>	I would taker in consideration what is the typical type of
>	file would be compressed and what is the benefit vs the tradeoffs.
Disks
>	are already too slow, isn't the overhead of just uncompressing
the blocks,
>	on demand in a random access pattern add a delay to the fs object.
However,
>	I will proceed with the assumption that this approach may have
some merit.

Actually, systems tend to be I/O bound more than compute bound.
By compressing a file, you potentially are trading off I/Os for CPU
cycles (A good tradeoff I believe).  Your I/Os will be smaller, but the
CPU must expend cycles to uncompress it.  I have seen on some
systems with fast CPUs and increase in system performance due to
the smaller I/Os involved with compressed files.

Darren R. Davis
Senior Software Engineer
Novell, Inc.





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?s184d060.037>