From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Mar 3 02:56:40 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id CAA10110 for ports-outgoing; Fri, 3 Mar 1995 02:56:40 -0800 Received: from post.demon.co.uk (post.demon.co.uk [158.152.1.72]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with SMTP id CAA10104 for ; Fri, 3 Mar 1995 02:56:37 -0800 Received: from punt.demon.co.uk by post.demon.co.uk id ap14574; 3 Mar 95 10:51 GMT Received: from palmer.demon.co.uk by punt.demon.co.uk id aa20216; 3 Mar 95 10:42 GMT Received: from localhost (gary@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by palmer.demon.co.uk (8.6.9/8.6.9) with SMTP id KAA00943; Fri, 3 Mar 1995 10:36:37 GMT X-Authentication-Warning: palmer.demon.co.uk: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol To: David Muir Sharnoff cc: jkh@FreeBSD.org, ports@freefall.cdrom.com Subject: Re: Ok, I'm stumped. In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 03 Mar 1995 02:06:37 PST." <199503031006.CAA19336@idiom.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <939.794226996.1@palmer.demon.co.uk> Date: Fri, 03 Mar 1995 10:36:36 +0000 Message-ID: <940.794226996@palmer.demon.co.uk> From: Gary Palmer Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In message <199503031006.CAA19336@idiom.com>, David Muir Sharnoff writes: > Hmmm, looks >like it happens in bsd.port.mk. At the IS_INTERACTIVE test, you want to >test agains the current name... Don't you need to do this in make, not >the shell? Err. You've lost me. The IS_INTERACTIVE test is a simple binary test. Nothing to do with the port name whatsoever. IS_INTERACTIVE is set in the Makefile of the interactive port, forcing bmake to skip it 'cos of the BATCH/IS_INTERACTIVE rules in bsd.port.mk. Or am I completely misunderstanding what you mean? Gary