From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 4 20:32:59 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75A9D106566C for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 20:32:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from tower.berklix.org (tower.berklix.org [83.236.223.114]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01B018FC17 for ; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 20:32:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (pD9FBF9BD.dip.t-dialin.net [217.251.249.189]) (authenticated bits=0) by tower.berklix.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id p84KWuTu041146; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 20:32:57 GMT (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p84KWgtr023374; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 22:32:44 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p84KWUIF073409; Sun, 4 Sep 2011 20:32:36 GMT (envelope-from jhs@fire.js.berklix.net) Message-Id: <201109042032.p84KWUIF073409@fire.js.berklix.net> To: Chris Rees From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://www.berklix.com BSD Unix Linux Consultancy, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://www.berklix.com/free/ X-URL: http://www.berklix.com In-reply-to: Your message "Sun, 04 Sep 2011 20:21:10 BST." Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 22:32:30 +0200 Sender: jhs@berklix.com Cc: ports@freebsd.org, yar@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sysutils/cfs X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2011 20:32:59 -0000 Hi, Reference: > From: Chris Rees > Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2011 20:21:10 +0100 > Message-id: Chris Rees wrote: > On 4 September 2011 17:56, Chris Rees wrote: > > Guys, > > > > I've had to deprecate sysutils/cfs -- there's a confirmed issue with > > failing locks [1] which has been open for two years with no fix. No reason to suddenly panic then. > > Please would someone consider stepping up to fix and maintain it? It > > has two months to live. > > > > Thanks! > > > > Chris > > > > [1] http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/137378 > > Whoops, also missed a CVE -- buffer overflows can cause a DoS. > Expiration date altered to 1 month accordingly. It is not responsible to threaten to remove ports without warning between releases for non urgent reasons. Better to deprecate such non urgent ports, & wait a while after next release is rolled, to give release users a warning & some time to volunteer (or if a firm using releases, perhaps time to allocate a staff member if a port is important to them). Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com Reply below, not above; Indent with "> "; Cumulative like a play script. Format: Plain text. Not HTML, multipart/alternative, base64, quoted-printable. http://www.softwarefreedomday.org 17th Sept, http://berklix.org/sfd/ Oct.