Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 19:38:38 -0400 From: Mark Saad <nonesuch@longcount.org> To: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it> Cc: "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" <hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Ringmap status Message-ID: <C2BBBB75-0A0B-4DBB-8E5C-35374E726FF7@longcount.org> In-Reply-To: <CA%2BhQ2%2Bj3Vg6BUWX660nPcY-KMsj%2BRabVra6jMz6jay3-yKMVMQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <A96B0400-5B70-44DE-A0E6-19B50512567E@longcount.org> <CA%2BhQ2%2Bj3Vg6BUWX660nPcY-KMsj%2BRabVra6jMz6jay3-yKMVMQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Luigi Thanks I had the names munged in my head . I'll read up and see if this works for me . Off hand are there any issues with what nics work or is this generic enough with sensible choices ? --- Mark Saad | nonesuch@longcount.org > On Apr 28, 2015, at 6:27 PM, Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it> wrote: > > > >> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 11:54 PM, Mark Saad <nonesuch@longcount.org> wrote: >> All >> I was wondering what the current state of ringmap was in 10 and head . I only see the original work on 8-Stable on Google code . Is this still being worked on ? > > don't think so. > But for those applications you can now use netmap. > > cheers > luigi >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?C2BBBB75-0A0B-4DBB-8E5C-35374E726FF7>