Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2025 18:44:49 -0600 From: Jim Thompson <jim@netgate.com> To: Daniel Lovasko <daniel.lovasko@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: wg ifconfing control Message-ID: <DA7CA979-415C-49E2-9A6B-FF91A245D5FA@netgate.com> In-Reply-To: <CA%2BcSnN1UYpecBV145FAkdySM9otr%2BOPTfaWL6PUfj14VEinGVQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <CA%2BcSnN1UYpecBV145FAkdySM9otr%2BOPTfaWL6PUfj14VEinGVQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
We had it. It was part of the original implementation that others decided to rip out be= cause of politics.=20 I doubt the powers that be (who tore it out) will put it back and will inhib= it anyone else doing so.=20 I=E2=80=99m sure I have the code somewhere if you really want to try.=20 Jim > On Jan 22, 2025, at 5:41=E2=80=AFPM, Daniel Lovasko <daniel.lovasko@gmail.= com> wrote: >=20 > =EF=BB=BF > Hello all, >=20 > I noticed that OpenBSD has added the ability to control the WireGuard inte= rfaces through ifconfig. I am interested in implementing similar support in = FreeBSD - is there anyone already working on this or perhaps the right mento= r for adding this functionality? NetBSD has a similar functionality exposed t= hrough the wgconfig tool. >=20 > Short rationale: 1) not needing a package to do the setup, 2) procedural c= onfiguration, 3) ability to include all config in rc.conf, 4) consistency wi= th other interface types (e.g. carp or gre). >=20 > Cheers, > Daniel
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?DA7CA979-415C-49E2-9A6B-FF91A245D5FA>