From owner-freebsd-current Sun Sep 26 10:11:28 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from noop.colo.erols.net (noop.colo.erols.net [207.96.1.150]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E81D15245 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 1999 10:11:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gjp@noop.colo.erols.net) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=noop.colo.erols.net) by noop.colo.erols.net with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 11VHq7-000Geb-00; Sun, 26 Sep 1999 13:11:55 -0400 To: dmaddox@conterra.com Cc: Ollivier Robert , current@FreeBSD.ORG From: "Gary Palmer" Subject: Re: Loss of Functionality with newpnp In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 26 Sep 1999 13:05:46 EDT." <19990926130546.A548@dmaddox.conterra.com> Date: Sun, 26 Sep 1999 13:11:55 -0400 Message-ID: <64019.938365915@noop.colo.erols.net> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "Donald J . Maddox" wrote in message ID <19990926130546.A548@dmaddox.conterra.com>: > I'm just suggesting here that it would be nice if the authors of > this code would make it _equally functional_ to what was removed. > It's not nice to remove functionality unconditionally and then > provide no replacement at all... If people lose functionality, then it motivates them to help the author replace the functionality that is important to them, and for devices that the author probably has no access to.... We're a volunteer project Donald, and screaming blue murder 'cos your card doesn't work as well as it used to gets us nowhere. Have you contacted the newpcm author and asked if you can help to get AWE64 support back? Thats probably the best way to proceed. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message