Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 13:30:34 +0200 From: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com> To: Yar Tikhiy <yar@comp.chem.msu.su> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: CONFLICTS usage question Message-ID: <EA246302-C11A-11D8-9250-00039312D914@fillmore-labs.com> In-Reply-To: <20040618111024.GA5660@comp.chem.msu.su>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Yar Tikhiy wrote: > Is it all right if a wildcard pattern listed in CONFLICTS > matches the port's package itself? No. You will break installation with FORCE_PKG_REGISTER=yes. > Here's why I'm asking: > There is a port "mail/bogofilter" that has 2 child ports, > "mail/bogofilter-qdbm" and "mail/bogofilter-tdb". I'm about > to add the 3rd child port for it, "russian/ru-bogofilter". > Presently, the existing ports cross-list each other in CONFLICTS. > It seems easier to have a single CONFLICTS setting, in the master > port, that reads: > > CONFLICTS= bogofilter-* [a-z][a-z]-bogofilter-* > > Will that be legal in our ports framework? No, see above. Besides, you should use something like bogofilter-0.*, otherwise you would CONFLICT with ports like bogofilter-doc, which might coexist with the other ports. -Oliver
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?EA246302-C11A-11D8-9250-00039312D914>