Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 10:24:46 -0800 From: "Mooneer Salem" <mooneer@translator.cx> To: "Pawel Jakub Dawidek" <nick@garage.freebsd.pl>, <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: IPC and jail. Message-ID: <FHEMJMOKKMJDGKFOHHEPCEMCEPAA.mooneer@translator.cx> In-Reply-To: <20030217173905.GA64362@garage.freebsd.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello, PostgreSQL might be a good test, since it uses IPC to an extent. I also have some code for 5.0 that adds a struct prison pointer to the IPC primitives for tracking purposes. Although it doesn't give each jail its own IPC cache, it does ensure they don't step on each other. For the purpose of seperating the jail from the main environment though, your approach may be better. Thanks, -- Mooneer Salem GPLTrans: http://www.translator.cx/ lifeafterking.org: http://www.lifeafterking.org/ -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG [mailto:owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of Pawel Jakub Dawidek Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 9:39 AM To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Cc: chris@aims.com.au Subject: IPC and jail. Hello hackers. I'm preparing a patch against FreeBSD 4.7 (for now) which splits IPC zones between jails and main host. Every entity will have his own IPC memory not shared with others (jails or main host). Message queues are already patched, but it need to be tested - that's why I'm writing. Does anybody have any regression tests for IPC functionality? If not, which program use it and will be a good test? Thanks. -- Pawel Jakub Dawidek UNIX Systems Administrator http://garage.freebsd.pl Am I Evil? Yes, I Am. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?FHEMJMOKKMJDGKFOHHEPCEMCEPAA.mooneer>