From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 1 05:29:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE1D016A5DC; Thu, 1 Jun 2006 05:29:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FCFB43D45; Thu, 1 Jun 2006 05:29:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from [192.168.254.14] (imini.samsco.home [192.168.254.14]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k515OU7I004012; Wed, 31 May 2006 23:24:36 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <447E7A57.6050700@samsco.org> Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 23:25:43 -0600 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.7.7) Gecko/20050416 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Craig Rodrigues References: <1148962081.8820.49.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <20060530160405.GA39658@crodrigues.org> <1149006607.94908.5.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <20060531154439.GA5528@crodrigues.org> In-Reply-To: <20060531154439.GA5528@crodrigues.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=3.8 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.1.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.1 (2006-03-10) on pooker.samsco.org Cc: Joe Marcus Clarke , current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: -CURRENT does not recognize standard mount options X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2006 05:30:09 -0000 Craig Rodrigues wrote: > On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 12:30:07PM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > >>Should its kernel backend not support all of those options as well? Or >>perhaps global_opts in vfs_mount.c should be updated to support all > > > Can you try this patch? I'm not sure if "force" and "sync" > should be global_opts or not because I don't know They are no more global than the ACL or multilabel options, not to mentiont he NFS-specific options. > if they make sense for every FS, but for symmetry with what was > in mount_msdosfs before, we can push them into the filesystem code for msdosfs. > These inconsistencies between the various mount programs and > the various filesystem code is why I've been trying to push > towards using a single mount binary, and pushing the mount option > parsing into vfs_mount.c and the code for the specific filesystem. > We are not quite there yet, but we are a lot closer. > Thanks for doing the un-fun job of unwinding all of this. Scott