Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 21:43:47 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 249022] news/sabnzbdplus: Update to 3.0.2 Message-ID: <bug-249022-7788-3CfHqCAkRf@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-249022-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-249022-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D249022 --- Comment #6 from daniel.engberg.lists@pyret.net --- There are several reasons why many ports doesn't use MASTER_SITES despite b= eing on GitHub, many projects simply doesn't provide release archives/tarballs (= this seems to be common for projects written in rust or go for instance). Other reasons might be that it wasn't available when the port was created, unit t= ests are stipped (only valid if used for test target) and so on. There are effor= ts to do this but it takes time and is sometimes simply missed. Example: (mid page and older commits) https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd-ports/commits?after=3D9efc13cef085cdfd88= ecc8a1c4c0608a5d7a9b6f+69&author=3Dsunpoet=20 While availability might not always be better it's a static file and usually smaller such in this case (~4Mbyte vs ~2.6Mbyte). --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-249022-7788-3CfHqCAkRf>