Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 16:00:15 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: mdf@FreeBSD.org, "O. Hartmann" <ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Sleeping thread (tid 100033, pid 16): panic in FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT/amd64 r228662 Message-ID: <4EF094EF.6000005@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <201112200852.23300.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <4EED2F1C.2060409@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20111217204514.2fa77ea2@kan.dyndns.org> <CAMBSHm_MHAhTMafuHkMh_CAdOcU4zgJUgbzTNhLvajDFSp45UA@mail.gmail.com> <201112200852.23300.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 20/12/2011 15:52 John Baldwin said the following: > -#ifdef DDB > - db_trace_thread(td, -1); > +#ifdef STACK > + stack_zero(&st); > + stack_save_td(&st, td); > + stack_print_ddb(&st); > #endif This leads to an idea - what about an umbrella stack_print() that would call the best stack printing routine, if any, based on their availabilities (STACK, DDB, etc?). P.S. Sorry to hijack the thread. -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4EF094EF.6000005>