From owner-freebsd-current Sun Mar 16 10:12:48 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50F4F37B401 for ; Sun, 16 Mar 2003 10:12:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from pimout2-ext.prodigy.net (pimout2-ext.prodigy.net [207.115.63.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A824943F75 for ; Sun, 16 Mar 2003 10:12:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wa1ter@myrealbox.com) Received: from myrealbox.com (adsl-67-114-254-138.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [67.114.254.138]) by pimout2-ext.prodigy.net (8.12.3 patch/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h2GICjlK307724 for ; Sun, 16 Mar 2003 13:12:45 -0500 Message-ID: <3E74BEA3.6070603@myrealbox.com> Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2003 10:12:51 -0800 From: walt Organization: none User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.3b) Gecko/20030213 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Why did INVARIANTS hide the geom bug? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG If inclusion of INVARIANTS serves to disguise bugs in the kernel, I wonder if kernel committers should be using this option routinely? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message