From owner-freebsd-current Sat Aug 26 17:12:35 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from relay.butya.kz (butya-gw.butya.kz [212.154.129.94]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11FF537B424; Sat, 26 Aug 2000 17:12:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by relay.butya.kz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 89BAC28C4A; Sun, 27 Aug 2000 07:12:25 +0700 (ALMST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.butya.kz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F29C28703; Sun, 27 Aug 2000 07:12:25 +0700 (ALMST) Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2000 07:12:25 +0700 (ALMST) From: Boris Popov To: Poul-Henning Kamp Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PATCH: devfs mkIII test & review please. In-Reply-To: <84513.966631292@critter> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 18 Aug 2000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > Missing: > Rename > Subdirs. > Close some race conditions using guaranteed atomic operations. > Mountoption (ro ?) to prevent new devices from appearing in an instance. > All uses of cdevsw_add() needs to be use devfs_clone() instead. How should 3rd party KLDs implement cloning function ? For now it seems to be impossible to use a single binary for DEVFS and non-DEVFS case. -- Boris Popov http://www.butya.kz/~bp/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message