From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 7 19:33:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2197616A4DA; Fri, 7 Jul 2006 19:33:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from server.baldwin.cx (66-23-211-162.clients.speedfactory.net [66.23.211.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A9CB43D46; Fri, 7 Jul 2006 19:33:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from localhost.corp.yahoo.com (john@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by server.baldwin.cx (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k67JXmsQ020399; Fri, 7 Jul 2006 15:33:49 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) From: John Baldwin To: Mike Jakubik Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2006 15:26:47 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <20060629193346.GA2548@dragon.NUXI.org> <200607071343.14205.jhb@freebsd.org> <44AEAB61.6000104@rogers.com> In-Reply-To: <44AEAB61.6000104@rogers.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200607071526.47758.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (server.baldwin.cx [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 07 Jul 2006 15:33:49 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.87.1/1589/Fri Jul 7 10:37:51 2006 on server.baldwin.cx X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=4.2 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on server.baldwin.cx Cc: stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, obrien@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Still getting 'calcru: runtime went backwards' X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2006 19:33:51 -0000 On Friday 07 July 2006 14:43, Mike Jakubik wrote: > John Baldwin wrote: > > That is partly because when you run top it queries the resource usage of > > the various processes via fill_kinfo_proc(). When you don't run top, no > > one is asking for the resource usage numbers, so the kernel doesn't waste > > time calculating them. > > Right, also running ps has the same effect. But why do these messages occur? Not sure. My guess would be an overflow of some sort but given the short uptime that likely is not the case. -- John Baldwin