From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 15 01:07:36 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A20137B401; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 01:07:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-64-169-104-32.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [64.169.104.32]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF79D43F93; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 01:07:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [10.0.0.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FC6666D16; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 01:07:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D2B47C03; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 01:07:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 01:07:18 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Ian Freislich Message-ID: <20030715080718.GA21011@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <20030715061614.GA20455@rot13.obsecurity.org> <1916.1058252904@mci.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1916.1058252904@mci.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: jeff@FreeBSD.org cc: current@FreeBSD.org cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: Process stats wrong under ULE X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 08:07:36 -0000 --pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 09:08:24AM +0200, Ian Freislich wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: > > I'm seeing the following kind of behaviour under ULE on a UP machine > > (kernel updated earlier this evening). Notice that the total CPU% > > adds up to way more than 100%; indeed one single process is allegedly > > using more than 100% CPU, and (not clear from the top(1) output) the > > processes that are sleeping do not have their CPU% updated until the > > next time they run. >=20 > Jeff is aware of this and has said it is on his list of things to > fix. Not sure where on his list it is though. OK, thanks! Kris --pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/E7Y2Wry0BWjoQKURAiJKAJ90PbgZwBHGbOShH8nBQka3bAuOhgCfeBvy fV3bG9BVkVorEMcuzrosX3g= =nxQx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pf9I7BMVVzbSWLtt--